Conciliation and Posh act 2013

Conciliation is a method of resolving a conflict between parties by the use of a mediator. Only if the aggrieved party demands it, the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) will facilitate conciliation as a means of resolving workplace sexual assault complaints.

Before conducting an investigation under section 11, the ICC should attempt to resolve the dispute between the aggrieved woman and the respondent by conciliation. It should be remembered that the respondent has no right to request conciliation) and that “no monetary settlement” shall be used as a ground for conciliation. Where a settlement has been reached, the ICC shall report the terms of the agreement and forward them to the employer, who shall proceed in accordance with the advice.

The ICC shall supply the aggrieved woman and the respondent with copies of the resolution as reported.

Where a settlement is arrived at, no further inquiry shall be conducted by the ICC.  Conciliation is a mechanism used by the ICC to offer a substantive approach to problems posed by complainants in a reasonable and impartial manner. A settlement, such as an oral/written apology or admission of guilt, to prevent a protracted court proceeding that may be costly, inconvenient, and frustrating.

There is no prescribed procedure by the Act, so the ICC has freedom to conduct it the way it seems appropriate and follow the principles of natural justice and gender sensitivity. 

Suggested procedure to be followed:  Only carefully examined and deemed minor offenses should be solved through conciliation and major offenses (As decided by ICC to be serious) should not be attempted by conciliation.

1. A written complaint by the victim/complainant and a written request for conciliation (either through mail or written complaint) is a must.  

2. Complainant may in such request, set out her terms for conciliation (cannot include terms for monetary settlement). 

3. The ICC has to provide a copy of the complaint and such terms of conciliation as requested by the complainant to the Respondent (alleged harasser).  

4. The ICC should choose an appropriate and comfortable venue for both the parties to initiate the talk. 

5. The conciliation has to be conducted by any member of the ICC chosen by the presiding officer. The external consultant may oversee the proceedings to eliminate any sort of bias. 

6. ICC has to document details of meeting between the committee representatives, the complainant and respondent (alleged harasser) in the conciliation proceeding.  

7. Once a satisfactory settlement has been arrived at, it has to be documented and signed by all the parties who were part of the conciliation procedure. 

8. A copy of the settlement has to be given to the complainant, the respondent, the employer and one copy to be filed by the ICC for their records. 

9. Any information related to conciliation in a matter of sexual harassment shall not be published, communicated or made known to the public, press and media. The settlement reached between parties i.e. ICC members, Complainant, Respondent (alleged harasser) shall remain utmost confidential.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Workplace sexual harassment and employee attrition

Image
Introduction Workplace sexual harassment results in employee attrition and is a serious issue that affects many employees around the world. Seven out of ten women who leave a workplace due to an experience of workplace sexual harassment do so without informing their employer.  This is a troubling statistic that raises questions about why so many victims of workplace sexual harassment do not come forward. In this article, we will explore some of the reasons why employees do not file a complaint of workplace sexual harassment, AND, as an employer, what is it that you can do to change this.  Reasons for not reporting workplace sexual harassment Fear of Retaliation One of the main reasons why employees do not file a complaint of workplace sexual harassment is fear of retaliation. Victims may worry that they will be retaliated against by their harasser, their supervisor, or other co-workers if they report the harassment.  Retaliation can take many forms, including being demoted, having hour
Read more

Breaking the Silence: Addressing Retaliation in the Workplace.

Retaliation against employees who report sexual harassment or misconduct is a serious issue that can perpetuate a culture of fear and silence. In this article, we examine a hypothetical case study involving retaliation against a whistleblower and discuss the importance of protecting employees who come forward with complaints. Case Study : Retaliation Scenario: Jane, a diligent employee, finds herself in a challenging situation after bravely reporting sexual harassment by her colleague. Instead of receiving support and protection, Jane experiences ostracism and denial of opportunities for advancement within the company. The hostile environment she faces leaves her feeling isolated and discouraged. Response: Retaliation against whistleblowers not only undermines the integrity of the reporting process but also creates a toxic work environment that can have far-reaching consequences. Here's how organizations can respond effectively to instances of retaliation: 1. Thorough Investig
Read more

Rights of Accused in POSH ACT 2013

The Protection of Women from Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013 , primarily aims to prevent and redress sexual harassment of women at the workplace. While the Act is designed to protect the rights and dignity of women who are victims of sexual harassment, it also includes provisions to ensure that the accused individuals are treated fairly and have their rights upheld. Here are some key rights of the accused under the POSH Act: Right to a Fair and Impartial Inquiry:  The accused has the right to a fair and impartial inquiry into the allegations of sexual harassment. The Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or the Local Complaints Committee (LCC), responsible for conducting the inquiry, must ensure that the process is unbiased and follows the principles of natural justice. Right to Be Informed:   The accused has the right to be informed of the allegations made against them. They should receive a written complaint or notice detailing the charges and any evidence provided by the complainan
Read more